The equity terminal that shows its work.
Every number is computed deterministically from the actual filing, so the AI never makes numbers up. It shows the math, the source, and the exact query it ran. It will explain a stock. It will never tell you to buy it.
Free tier, full terminal. No card. · Not investment advice.
The AI writes the query. The engine does the math. You see both.
Don't trust numbers from a screener
you didn't compute yourself.
Indian retail investors live between two bad options: tools that hand you a number with no proof, and chatbots that invent the proof. Both ask for the one thing you can't give them, blind faith.
"Why are the numbers different?"
Standalone or consolidated? Trailing or FY? Static screeners give you a single figure and no way to reconcile it against the filing. You're left guessing whose math it is.
The chatbot just makes it up.
Ask a general-purpose AI for a P/E and it will confidently hallucinate one, wrong by a factor of ten, with no source and no way to check. Plausible is not the same as correct.
₹4,999 to see one ratio.
The genuinely useful features (backtests, exports, full history) sit behind annual plans that price out exactly the people learning to invest. Research shouldn't be a luxury good.
Every number
opens up.
Click any figure and the terminal unfolds the arithmetic that produced it (the inputs, the operation, the answer), each input tagged with the exact filing it came from. Nothing is computed off-screen.
- Deterministic, not generative. The same query gives the same answer, every time. Math, not vibes.
- Sourced to the filing. Every input links to the BSE/NSE document and period it was read from.
- You pick the basis. Standalone vs consolidated, TTM vs FY. Switch it and watch the math recompute live.
Every backtest comes with a receipt.
Ask in plain English; get back an auditable trace: the exact query, the parameters, the data source, the result, and what it doesn't account for yet. If you can't reproduce it, it isn't research, it's a rumour.
Methodology honesty
The receipt also says what the number doesn't include. We tell you the strategy used point-in-time prices and modeled costs (and that survivorship isn't adjusted for yet) rather than print a glossy number you can't trust.
point-in-time prices · costs modeled · not survivorship-adjusted yet
printed on every backtestReproducible by design
Replay the same query tomorrow and get the identical result. The data is point-in-time, so nothing drifts under you. The receipt is the trust artifact: it's the difference between an answer and a claim.
Run a backtest (Pro)The only screener that flags its own suspect data.
When a filing parse looks wrong, 101Wealth doesn't quietly serve it. The data-quality guard caught PERSISTENT showing revenue of ₹1,47,484cr (roughly 10× too high, a units error against a true figure near ₹14,748cr) and flagged it verify instead of showing it as fact.
Most tools assume their data is clean and pass the error straight to you. We assume ours might be wrong, and prove that we checked, in front of you. No other screener audits its own numbers like this.
Generous free tier.
Honest paid one.
The full deterministic terminal is free: screener, technicals, news, macro, alt-data, plus a few AI queries a day. No card. Pro removes the limits, on purpose.
Free
no cardThe full deterministic terminal, for everyone.
Open the terminal- Full NIFTY-500 terminal & screener
- Technicals, news, macro & alt-data
- Show-the-math drill-downs & self-audit flags
- A few AI queries / day
Pro
unlimitedor ₹2,999 / year, for people who research seriously.
Go Pro- Everything in Free, plus:
- Unlimited AI chat
- Fundamental backtesting + receipts
- Data export
Cancel anytime. · ₹399/mo or ₹2,999/yr. The transparency is the product.